A QSAR analysis of toxicity of Aconitum alkaloids

Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology
2004.0

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Biological activity of <jats:italic>Aconitum</jats:italic> alkaloids may be related to their toxicity rather than to a specific pharmacological action. A Quantitative structure‐activity relationships (QSAR) analysis was performed on the following two groups of alkaloids: compounds with an aroyl/aroyloxy group at R<jats:sub>14</jats:sub> position (yunaconitine, bulleyaconitine, aconitine, beiwutine, nagarine, 3‐acetyl aconitine, and penduline), and compounds with the aroyloxy group at R<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> position (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic>‐deacetyllappaconitine, lappaconitine, ranaconitine, <jats:italic>N</jats:italic>‐deacetylfinaconitine, <jats:italic>N</jats:italic>‐deacetylranaconitine). The <jats:italic>LD</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>mol/kg) of the 12 alkaloids were obtained from the literature. <jats:italic>LD</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2. The steric and core–core repulsion energies were significantly higher in group 1. The total energy and heat of formation and electronic energies were significantly lower in group 1. The reactivity index of N, C1′, C4′ and C6′ were similar between groups. The reactivity index of C2′ was significantly higher and the reactivity index of C3′ and C5′ were significantly lower in group 1. Log P and p<jats:italic>K</jats:italic>a were similar between groups. Molecular weight was significantly higher in group 1. A significant linear relationship was observed between log <jats:italic>LD</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> and either analgesic log <jats:italic>ED</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> or local anesthetic log <jats:italic>ED</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub>. The <jats:italic>LD</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub>/analgesic <jats:italic>ED</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> obtained from average values was 5.9 for group 1 and 5.0 for group 2. However, the <jats:italic>LD</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub>/local anesthetic <jats:italic>ED</jats:italic><jats:sub>50</jats:sub> was 40.4 and 318, respectively. The study supports that the analgesic effects of these alkaloids are secondary to their toxic effects whereas alkaloids from group 2 are susceptible to be further studied as local anesthetic agents.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

A QSAR analysis of toxicity of <i>Aconitum</i> alkaloids
Fundamental &amp; Clinical Pharmacology 2004.0
Aconitum and Delphinium alkaloids of curare-like activity. QSAR analysis and molecular docking of alkaloids into AChBP
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2010.0
Study on the quantitative structure–toxicity relationships of aconitine compounds basing on PCA-ANN method
Medicinal Chemistry Research 2013.0
Diterpene Alkaloids from the Roots of Aconitum moldavicum and Assessment of Nav 1.2 Sodium Channel Activity of Aconitum Alkaloids
Planta Medica 2014.0
Systematic investigation on the distribution of four hidden toxic Aconitum alkaloids in commonly used Aconitum herbs and their acute toxicity
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2022.0
Potentially Cardiotoxic Diterpenoid Alkaloids from the Roots of <i>Aconitum carmichaelii</i>
Journal of Natural Products 2019.0
Potential antitumor agents. 36. Quantitative relationships between experimental antitumor activity, toxicity, and structure for the general class of 9-anilinoacridine antitumor agents
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1982.0
Evaluation of the Local Anesthetic Activity, Acute Toxicity, and Structure–Toxicity Relationship in Series of Synthesized 1-Aryltetrahydroisoquinoline Alkaloid Derivatives In Vivo and In Silico
Molecules 2023.0
Antinociceptive diterpenoid alkaloids from the roots of Aconitum austroyunnanense
Journal of Asian Natural Products Research 2023.0
Advances on pharmacology and toxicology of aconitine
Fundamental &amp; Clinical Pharmacology 2022.0