Cross-Validated R2-Guided Region Selection for Comparative Molecular Field Analysis: A Simple Method To Achieve Consistent Results

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
1995.0

Abstract

Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) is one of the most powerful modern tools for quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. The CoMFA predictability is conventionally characterized by a cross-validated correlation coefficient R2 (q2). Our CoMFA investigation of 4 datasets, including 7 cephalotaxine esters, 20 5-HT1A receptor ligands, 59 inhibitors of HIV protease, and 21 steroids reveals that the q2 value is sensitive to the overall orientation of superimposed molecules on a computer terminal and can vary by as much as 0.5q2 units when the orientation is varied by systematic rotation. To optimize CoMFA, we have developed a new routine, cross-validated R2-guided region selection (q2-GRS). We first subdivide the rectangular lattice obtained initially with conventional CoMFA into 125 small boxes and perform 125 independent analyses using probe atoms placed within each box with the step size of 1.0 A. We then select only those small boxes for which a q2 is higher than a specified optimal cutoff value. Finally, we repeat CoMFA with the union of small boxes selected at the previous step. Four datasets described above were used to validate this new q2-GRS routine. In each case we have obtained an orientation-independent, high q2, exceeding the one obtained with the conventional CoMFA. This method shall be used routinely in the future CoMFA studies to guarantee the reproducibility of the reported q2 values.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

Cross-Validated R2-Guided Region Selection for Comparative Molecular Field Analysis: A Simple Method To Achieve Consistent Results
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1995.0
Structure-Based Alignment and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1996.0
CoMFA analysis of tgDHFR and rlDHFR based on antifolates with 6–5 fused ring system using the all-orientation search (AOS) routine and a modified cross-validated r2-guided region selection (q2-GRS) routine and its initial application
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2010.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationships of Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) Inhibitors: A Comparative Molecular Field Analysis
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2001.0
CoMFA and CoMSIA analysis of ACE-inhibitory, antimicrobial and bitter-tasting peptides
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2014.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Analysis of Propafenone-Type Multidrug Resistance Modulators:  Influence of Variable Selection on Test Set Predictivity
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2003.0
3D-QSAR(Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure)-Activity Relationship Of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme And Thermolysin Inhibitors. II. A Comparison Of CoMFA Models Incorporating Molecular Orbital Fields And Desolvation Free Energies Based On Active-Analog And Complementary-Receptor-Field Alignment Rules
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1993.0
QSAR's from similarity matrices. Technique validation and application in the comparison of different similarity evaluation methods
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1993.0
CoMFA studies and in vitro evaluation of some 3-substituted benzylthio quinolinium salts as anticryptococcal agents
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2013.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship of Melatonin Receptor Ligands:  A Comparative Molecular Field Analysis Study
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1997.0