Synthesis and Histamine H1 Receptor Agonist Activity of a Series of 2-Phenylhistamines, 2-Heteroarylhistamines, and Analogs

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
1995.0

Abstract

New histamine derivatives characterized by a (substituted) aryl, heteroaryl, benzyl, or heteroarylmethyl substituent in the C2 position of the imidazole ring have been prepared from appropriate imidates or amidines, respectively, and 2-oxo-4-phthalimido-1-butyl acetate (1). The compounds were screened as potential H1 receptor agonists on the isolated guinea pig ileum. The 3-halogenated 2-phenylhistamines (halogen = Br (35) and I (36)) were equipotent with histamine, while 2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)histamine (2-[2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl]ethanamine (39)) was significantly more potent than histamine (39: pD2 = 6.81, relative activity = 128%). The 2-substituted histamine analogues were partial H1 receptor agonists on the endothelium-denuded isolated guinea pig aorta with pEC50 values generally smaller than observed on the guinea pig ileum, but the rank order of potency was found to be similar. The contractile effects on guinea pig ileum and aorta, respectively, could be blocked concentration-dependently by the H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine, yielding KB values for mepyramine in the nanomolar range. In vitro compounds 35 and 39 bound to [3H]mepyramine-labeled guinea pig cerebellar membranes with a pKi of 6.1 and 5.9, respectively. However, upon iv administration, 35 (3-100 mg/kg) and 39 (3-300 mg/kg) failed to inhibit the binding of [3H]mepyramine to mouse cerebral cortex in vivo, thereby indicating that these histamine derivatives are not able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. In functional in vitro studies on histamine H2, H3, and other neurotransmitter receptors the selectivity of 39 was found to be 2138 (H1:H2), > 64 (H1:H3), 1000 (H1:M3), 105 (H1:alpha 1), 708 (H1:beta 1), and 71 (H1:5HT2A). Thus compound 39 is the most potent and selective H1 receptor agonist reported so far. These results make meta-substituted 2-phenylhistamines, especially 2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)- and 2-(3-bromophenyl)histamine (39 and 35, respectively) valuable experimental tools for the selective stimulation of histamine H1 receptors and the study of H1 receptor-mediated functions.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

Synthesis and Histamine H1 Receptor Agonist Activity of a Series of 2-Phenylhistamines, 2-Heteroarylhistamines, and Analogs
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1995.0
Nα-alkylated derivatives of 2-phenylhistamines: Synthesis and in vitro activity of potent histamine H1-receptor agonists
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 1998.0
N<sup>α</sup>-Imidazolylalkyl and Pyridylalkyl Derivatives of Histaprodifen:  Synthesis and in Vitro Evaluation of Highly Potent Histamine H<sub>1</sub>-Receptor Agonists
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2003.0
Congener derivatives and conjugates of histamine: synthesis and tissue and receptor selectivity of the derivatives
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1987.0
Histaprodifens:  Synthesis, Pharmacological in Vitro Evaluation, and Molecular Modeling of a New Class of Highly Active and Selective Histamine H<sub>1</sub>-Receptor Agonists
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2000.0
Heterocyclic replacement of the central phenyl core of diamine-based histamine H3 receptor antagonists
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009.0
Homologs of Histamine as Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists: A New Potent and Selective H3 Antagonist, 4(5)-(5-Aminopentyl)-1H-imidazole
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1995.0
Synthesis and in Vitro Pharmacology of a Series of New Chiral Histamine H<sub>3</sub>-Receptor Ligands:  2-(RandS)-Amino-3-(1H-imidazol-4(5)-yl)propyl Ether Derivatives
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1999.0
Piperidine variations in search for non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligands
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry 2008.0
Role of Hydrophobic Substituents on the Terminal Nitrogen of Histamine in Receptor Binding and Agonist Activity: Development of an Orally Active Histamine Type 3 Receptor Agonist and Evaluation of Its Antistress Activity in Mice
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2010.0