Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Substrates for an Aryl Sulfotransferase Based on Catalytic Mechanism and Protein Homology Modeling

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
2002.0

Abstract

Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) methods were used to produce a 3D-QSAR model that correlated the catalytic efficiency of rat hepatic aryl sulfotransferase (AST) IV, expressed as log(k(cat)/K(m)), with the molecular structures of its substrates. A total of 35 substrate molecules were used to construct a CoMFA model that was evaluated on the basis of its leave-one-out cross-validated partial least-squares value (q(2)) and its ability to predict the activity of six additional substrates not used in the training set. The model was constructed using substrate conformations that favored (1) proton abstraction by the catalytic histidine residue, (2) an in-line sulfuryl-group transfer mechanism, and (3) constraints imposed by the residues lining the substrate binding pocket of a homology model of AST IV. This CoMFA model had a q(2) value of 0.691, and it successfully predicted the activities of the six molecules not used in the training set. A final CoMFA model was constructed using the same methodology but with molecules from both the training set and the test set. Its q(2) value was 0.701, and it had a non-cross-validated r(2) value of 0.922. The contour coefficient map generated by this CoMFA was overlaid on the amino acids in the substrate-binding pocket of the homology model of AST IV and found to show a good fit. Additionally external validation was obtained by using the CoMFA model to design substrates that show high activities. These results establish a methodology for prediction of the substrate specificity of this sulfotransferase based on CoMFA methods that are guided by both the homology model and the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Substrates for an Aryl Sulfotransferase Based on Catalytic Mechanism and Protein Homology Modeling
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2002.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Sulfonamide Endothelin Inhibitors
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1995.0
CoMFA studies and in vitro evaluation of some 3-substituted benzylthio quinolinium salts as anticryptococcal agents
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2013.0
3D-QSAR(Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure)-Activity Relationship Of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme And Thermolysin Inhibitors. II. A Comparison Of CoMFA Models Incorporating Molecular Orbital Fields And Desolvation Free Energies Based On Active-Analog And Complementary-Receptor-Field Alignment Rules
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1993.0
Structure-Based Alignment and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1996.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Analyses of Peptide Substrates of the Mammalian H<sup>+</sup>/Peptide Cotransporter PEPT1
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2003.0
3D-QSAR Studies on natural acetylcholinesterase inhibitors of Sarcococca saligna by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA)
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2003.0
3D-QSAR Studies on natural acetylcholinesterase inhibitors of Sarcococca saligna by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA)
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2003.0
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationships of Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) Inhibitors: A Comparative Molecular Field Analysis
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2001.0
3D-QSAR study of benzene sulfonamide analogs as carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2010.0