Structure−Activity Relationships of Dimethindene Derivatives as New M2-Selective Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
2003.0

Abstract

A series of 2,3-disubstituted indenes, which are analogues of the widely used histamine H(1) receptor antagonist dimethindene, have been synthesized and studied as muscarinic and histamine receptor antagonists. The affinities of these compounds for the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes (M(1)-M(5)) and for human histamine H(1) receptors were determined in radioligand binding studies using membranes from transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and [(3)H]N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]NMS). The results demonstrate that the diisopropyl analogue 19 has a similar high affinity as (S)-dimethindene at M(2) receptors ((S)-dimethindene: pK(i) = 7.52; (-)-19: pK(i) = 7.37) with an improved selectivity pattern ((S)-dimethindene: M(2)/M(1) = 6-fold, M(2)/M(3) = 5-fold, M(2)/M(4) = 10-fold, M(2)/M(5) = 25-fold; (-)-19: M(2)/M(1) = 36-fold, M(2)/M(3) = 96-fold, M(2)/M(4) = 42-fold, M(2)/M(5) = 275-fold). In addition, compound (-)-19 showed 35-fold lower affinity at histamine H(1) receptors (pK(i) = 5.61) than (S)-dimethindene (pK(i) = 7.16). Another interesting compound is the fluoroethyl derivative 20 (pK(i)/M(2) = 7.49), which also exhibits a higher M(2) selectivity (M(2)/M(1) = 19-fold; M(2)/M(3) = 22-fold; M(2)/M(4) = 13-fold; M(2)/M(5) = 62-fold) than (S)-dimethindene. Unfortunately, compound 20 also shows a high affinity for histamine H(1) receptors (pK(i) = 8.14). The compound with the highest affinity for M(2) receptors (pK(i) = 7.91), the dimethylaminomethylene analogue 31, displayed only a small preference for M(2) receptors. In conclusion, compound (-)-19 might be useful to test the hypothesis that blockade of muscarinic M(2) receptors in the brain is a viable mechanism by which to produce improved cognition. This second-generation dimethindene analogue might also be the starting point for the development of M(2)-selective muscarinic antagonists useful for quantifying M(2) receptors in the central nervous system with positron emission tomography imaging.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

Structure−Activity Relationships of Dimethindene Derivatives as New M<sub>2</sub>-Selective Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2003.0
Design and pharmacology of quinuclidine derivatives as M2-selective muscarinic receptor ligands
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2001.0
6H,13H-Pyrazino[1,2-a;4,5-a′]diindole analogs: Probing the pharmacophore for allosteric ligands of muscarinic M2 receptors
Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2006.0
Synthesis and Histamine H1 Receptor Agonist Activity of a Series of 2-Phenylhistamines, 2-Heteroarylhistamines, and Analogs
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1995.0
Antimuscarinic 3-(2-Furanyl)quinuclidin-2-ene Derivatives:  Synthesis and Structure−Activity Relationships
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1997.0
Abolishing Dopamine D<sub>2long</sub>/D<sub>3</sub> Receptor Affinity of Subtype-Selective Carbamoylguanidine-Type Histamine H<sub>2</sub> Receptor Agonists
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021.0
2-[(2,3-Dihydro-1H-indol-1-yl)methyl]melatonin Analogues: A Novel Class of MT<sub>2</sub>-Selective Melatonin Receptor Antagonists
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2009.0
Synthesis and muscarinic receptor activity of ester derivatives of 2-substituted 2-azabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-5-ol and -6-ol
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1992.0
Synthesis and Structure−Activity Relationships of Novel Histamine H<sub>1</sub> Antagonists:  Indolylpiperidinyl Benzoic Acid Derivatives
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2004.0
Muscarinic receptor binding and activation of second messengers by substituted N-methyl-N-[4-(1-azacycloalkyl)-2-butynyl]acetamides
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1991.0