Activity of Linezolid in anIn VitroPharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model Using Different Dosages andStaphylococcus aureusandEnterococcus faecalisStrains with and without a Hypermutator Phenotype

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
2010.0

Abstract

The influence of antibiotic dosages and bacterial mutator phenotypes on the emergence of linezolid-resistant mutants was evaluated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. A twice-daily 0.5-h infusion of a 200-, 600-, or 800-mg dose for 48 h was simulated against four strains (MIC, 2 microg/ml): Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 and its mutator derivative MutS2, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, and a mutator clinical strain of E. faecalis, Ef1497. The peak concentrations (4.38 to 4.79, 13.4 to 14.6, and 19.2 to 19.5 microg/ml) and half-lives at beta-phase (5.01 to 6.72 h) fit human plasma linezolid pharmacokinetics. Due to its bacteriostatic property, the cumulative percentages of the dosing interval during which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T > MIC), 66.6 and 69.1% of the dosing interval, were not significant, except for Ef1497, with an 800-mg dose and a T > MIC of 80.9%. At the standard 600-mg dosage, resistant mutants (2- to 8-fold MIC increases) were selected only with Ef1497. A lower, 200-mg dosage did not select resistant mutants of E. faecalis ATCC 29212, but a higher, 800-mg dosage against Ef1497 did not prevent their emergence. For the most resistant mutant (MIC, 16 microg/ml), characterization of 23S rRNA genes revealed the substitution A2453G in two of the four operons, which was previously described only in in vitro mutants of archaebacteria. Nevertheless, this mutant did not yield further mutants under 600- or 200-mg treatment. In conclusion, linezolid was consistently efficient against S. aureus strains. The emergence of resistant E. faecalis mutants was probably favored by the rapid decline of linezolid concentrations against a strong mutator, a phenotype less exceptional in E. faecalis than in S. aureus.

Knowledge Graph

Similar Paper

Activity of Linezolid in anIn VitroPharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model Using Different Dosages andStaphylococcus aureusandEnterococcus faecalisStrains with and without a Hypermutator Phenotype
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010.0
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Factors Influencing Emergence of Resistance to Linezolid in an In Vitro Model
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007.0
Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus : Gene Dosage Effect, Stability, Fitness Costs, and Cross-Resistances
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008.0
Delayed Development of Linezolid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus following Exposure to Low Levels of Antimicrobial Agents
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008.0
Elevated Linezolid Resistance in Clinical cfr -Positive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Is Associated with Co-Occurring Mutations in Ribosomal Protein L3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010.0
Development of Resistance in Wild-Type and Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Exposed to Clinical Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Meropenem and Ceftazidime Simulated In Vitro
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007.0
Use of an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model To Derive a Linezolid Regimen That Optimizes Bacterial Kill and Prevents Emergence of Resistance in Bacillus anthracis
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008.0
Linezolid and Tiamulin Cross-Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Mediated by Point Mutations in the Peptidyl Transferase Center
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2008.0
Mutations in 23S rRNA at the Peptidyl Transferase Center and Their Relationship to Linezolid Binding and Cross-Resistance
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010.0
In Vitro Activity of the Oxazolidinone RWJ-416457 against Linezolid-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococci and Enterococci
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007.0